logo
bg_imgbg_imgbg_imgbg_img
exclamation mark iconReport an issue

If you notice some outdated information please let us know!

close icon
Name
Email
Your message
arrow-left

GMX V1

85%

Process Quality Review (0.8)

GMX V1

Final score:85%
Date:22 Apr 2022
Audit Process:version 0.8
Author:Nicolas Vyncke
PQR Score:85%

PASS

Protocol Website:https://gmx.io/

Scoring Appendix

The final review score is indicated as a percentage. The percentage is calculated as Achieved Points due to MAX Possible Points. For each element the answer can be either Yes/No or a percentage. For a detailed breakdown of the individual weights of each question, please consult this document.

The blockchain used by this protocol
Arbitrum
Avalanche
#QuestionAnswer
78%
1.100%
2.100%
3.Yes
4.100%
5.0
79%
6.Yes
7.Yes
8.50%
9.100%
70%
10.100%
11.50%
12.Yes
13.0%
14.No
15.Yes
91%
16.90%
17.100%
89%
18.70%
19.80%
20.100%
21.100%
22.90%
23.80%
24.100%
25.100%
100%
26.100
27.Yes
28.Yes
Total:85%

Very simply, the audit looks for the following declarations from the developer's site. With these declarations, it is reasonable to trust the smart contracts.

  • Here is my smart contract on the blockchain
  • You can see it matches a software repository used to develop the code
  • Here is the documentation that explains what my smart contract does
  • Here are the tests I ran to verify my smart contract
  • Here are the audit(s) performed to review my code by third party experts

This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice of any kind, nor does it constitute an offer to provide investment advisory or other services. Nothing in this report shall be considered a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any security, token, future, option or other financial instrument or to offer or provide any investment advice or service to any person in any jurisdiction. Nothing contained in this report constitutes investment advice or offers any opinion with respect to the suitability of any security, and the views expressed in this report should not be taken as advice to buy, sell or hold any security. The information in this report should not be relied upon for the purpose of investing. In preparing the information contained in this report, we have not taken into account the investment needs, objectives and financial circumstances of any particular investor. This information has no regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any specific recipient of this information and investments discussed may not be suitable for all investors.

Any views expressed in this report by us were prepared based upon the information available to us at the time such views were written. The views expressed within this report are limited to DeFiSafety and the author and do not reflect those of any additional or third party and are strictly based upon DeFiSafety, its authors, interpretations and evaluation of relevant data. Changed or additional information could cause such views to change. All information is subject to possible correction. Information may quickly become unreliable for various reasons, including changes in market conditions or economic circumstances.

This completed report is copyright (c) DeFiSafety 2023. Permission is given to copy in whole, retaining this copyright label.

Smart Contracts & Team

78%

This section looks at the code deployed on the relevant chain that gets reviewed and its corresponding software repository. The document explaining these questions is here.

1. Are the smart contract addresses easy to find? (%)

Answer: 100%

GMX's smart contract addresses can be found at https://gmxio.gitbook.io/gmx/contracts, as indicated in the Appendix.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
Clearly labelled and on website, documents or repository, quick to find
70%
Clearly labelled and on website, docs or repo but takes a bit of looking
40%
Addresses in mainnet.json, in discord or sub graph, etc
20%
Address found but labeling not clear or easy to find
0%
Executing addresses could not be found

2. How active is the primary contract? (%)

Answer: 100%

Contract Router is used well over 100 times a day, as indicated in the Appendix.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
More than 10 transactions a day
70%
More than 10 transactions a week
40%
More than 10 transactions a month
10%
Less than 10 transactions a month
0%
No activity

3. Does the protocol have a public software repository? (Y/N)

Answer: Yes

Location: https://github.com/gmx-io/gmx-contracts

Score Guidance:
Yes
There is a public software repository with the code at a minimum, but also normally test and scripts. Even if the repository was created just to hold the files and has just 1 transaction.
No
For teams with private repositories.

4. Is there a development history visible? (%)

Answer: 100%

With 220 commits and 7 branches, GMX's main software repository is robustly developed.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
Any one of 100+ commits, 10+branches
70%
Any one of 70+ commits, 7+branches
50%
Any one of 50+ commits, 5+branches
30%
Any one of 30+ commits, 3+branches
0%
Less than 2 branches or less than 30 commits

5. Is the team public (not anonymous)?

Answer: 0

GMX is run by anonymous developers.

Score Guidance:
100%
At least two names can be easily found in the protocol's website, documentation or medium. These are then confirmed by the personal websites of the individuals / their linkedin / twitter.
50%
At least one public name can be found to be working on the protocol.
0%
No public team members could be found.

Documentation

79%

This section looks at the software documentation. The document explaining these questions is here.

6. Is there a whitepaper? (Y/N)

Answer: Yes

Location: https://gmxio.gitbook.io/gmx/

7. Is the protocol's software architecture documented? (Y/N)

Answer: Yes

GMX documents their general software architecture here.

Score Guidance:
Yes
The documents identify software architecture and contract interaction through any of the following: diagrams, arrows, specific reference to software functions or a written explanation on how smart contracts interact.
No
Protocols receive a "no" if none of these are included.

8. Does the software documentation fully cover the deployed contracts' source code? (%)

Answer: 50%

GMX covers some of their major functions here. This does not fully document software functions yet, and therefore 30% will be awarded. GMX also has API documentation here, for which 20% will be awarded.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
All contracts and functions documented
80%
Only the major functions documented
79 - 1%
Estimate of the level of software documentation
0%
No software documentation

9. Is it possible to trace the documented software to its implementation in the protocol's source code? (%)

Answer: 100%

GMX links every core smart contract to their respective source code locations in their GitHub. This can be seen in their Notion docs.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
Clear explicit traceability between code and documentation at a requirement level for all code
60%
Clear association between code and documents via non explicit traceability
40%
Documentation lists all the functions and describes their functions
0%
No connection between documentation and code

Testing

70%

10. Has the protocol tested their deployed code? (%)

Answer: 100%

Code examples are in the Appendix at the end of this report.. As per the SLOC, there is 174% testing to code (TtC).    This score is guided by the Test to Code ratio (TtC). Generally a good test to code ratio is over 100%. However, the reviewer's best judgement is the final deciding factor.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
TtC > 120% Both unit and system test visible
80%
TtC > 80% Both unit and system test visible
40%
TtC < 80% Some tests visible
0%
No tests obvious

11. How covered is the protocol's code? (%)

Answer: 50%

Although GMX does not have a public code coverage report, they certainly have a very in-depth testing suite.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
Documented full coverage
99 - 51%
Value of test coverage from documented results
50%
No indication of code coverage but clearly there is a complete set of tests
30%
Some tests evident but not complete
0%
No test for coverage seen

12. Does the protocol provide scripts and instructions to run their tests? (Y/N)

Answer: Yes

Scripts/Instructions location: https://github.com/gmx-io/gmx-contracts/tree/master/scripts

Score Guidance:
Yes
Scripts and/or instructions to run tests are available in the testing suite
No
Scripts and/or instructions to run tests are not available in the testing suite

13. Is there a detailed report of the protocol's test results?(%)

Answer: 0%

There is no visible test result report in any of GMX's documentation or GitHub repositories.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
Detailed test report as described below
70%
GitHub code coverage report visible
0%
No test report evident

14. Has the protocol undergone Formal Verification? (Y/N)

Answer: No

GMX has not undergone a Formal Verification test.

Score Guidance:
Yes
Formal Verification was performed and the report is readily available
No
Formal Verification was not performed and/or the report is not readily available.

15. Were the smart contracts deployed to a testnet? (Y/N)

Answer: Yes

GMX documents their previous testnet deployments here.

Score Guidance:
Yes
Protocol has proved their tesnet usage by providing the addresses
No
Protocol has not proved their testnet usage by providing the addresses

Security

91%

This section looks at the 3rd party software audits done. It is explained in this document.

16. Is the protocol sufficiently audited? (%)

Answer: 90%

GMX has been audited once pre-launch by ABDK Consulting. The audit report can be found here. Any major issues found were resolved by the GMX team, as mentioned here.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
Multiple Audits performed before deployment and the audit findings are public and implemented or not required
90%
Single audit performed before deployment and audit findings are public and implemented or not required
70%
Audit(s) performed after deployment and no changes required. The Audit report is public.
65%
Code is forked from an already audited protocol and a changelog is provided explaining why forked code was used and what changes were made. This changelog must justify why the changes made do not affect the audit.
50%
Audit(s) performed after deployment and changes are needed but not implemented.
30%
Audit(s) performed are low-quality and do not indicate proper due diligence.
20%
No audit performed
0%
Audit Performed after deployment, existence is public, report is not public OR smart contract address' not found.
Deduct 25% if the audited code is not available for comparison.

17. Is the bounty value acceptably high (%)

Answer: 100%

GMX offers an active bug bounty of $5m.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
Bounty is 10% TVL or at least $1M AND active program (see below)
90%
Bounty is 5% TVL or at least 500k AND active program
80%
Bounty is 5% TVL or at least 500k
70%
Bounty is 100k or over AND active program
60%
Bounty is 100k or over
50%
Bounty is 50k or over AND active program
40%
Bounty is 50k or over
20%
Bug bounty program bounty is less than 50k
0%
No bug bounty program offered / the bug bounty program is dead
An active program means that a third party (such as Immunefi) is actively driving hackers to the site. An inactive program would be static mentions on the docs.

Admin Controls

89%

This section covers the documentation of special access controls for a DeFi protocol. The admin access controls are the contracts that allow updating contracts or coefficients in the protocol. Since these contracts can allow the protocol admins to "change the rules", complete disclosure of capabilities is vital for user's transparency. It is explained in this document.

18. Is the protocol's admin control information easy to find?

Answer: 70%

GMX details their admin control information at this location, which took a bit of searching since it does not reside in their main gitbooks repository, and is instead linked from it.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
Admin Controls are clearly labelled and on website, docs or repo, quick to find
70%
Admin Controls are clearly labelled and on website, docs or repo but takes a bit of looking
40%
Admin Control docs are in multiple places and not well labelled
20%
Admin Control docs are in multiple places and not labelled
0%
Admin Control information could not be found

19. Are relevant contracts clearly labelled as upgradeable or immutable? (%)

Answer: 80%

GMX clearly mentions that the logic of their contracts is immutable, but peripheral functions such as fees and pricing calculations can be updated. As such, GMX contracts inherently do not possess an upgradeable structure.    - "The core logic of the GMX contracts cannot be changed, but certain peripheral functions such as fee and pricing calculations can be updated. This update is done by implementing new fee / pricing contracts and updating the core contracts to use the new contracts. For example, the Vault contract has a priceFeed value that can be changed by the Timelock contract described in the Access Control section".

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
Both the contract documentation and the smart contract code state that the code is not upgradeable or immutable.
80%
All Contracts are clearly labelled as upgradeable (or not)
50%
Code is immutable but not mentioned anywhere in the documentation
0%
Admin control information could not be found

20. Is the type of smart contract ownership clearly indicated? (%)

Answer: 100%

GMX contracts are controlled by a controlled account owned by the team. In addition, there is a Multisig consisting of advisors and community members. This multisig is composed of:    - Ben Simon  - Han Wen  - Krunal Amin

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
The type of ownership is clearly indicated in their documentation. (OnlyOwner / MultiSig / etc)
50%
The type of ownership is indicated, but only in the code. (OnlyOwner / MultiSig / etc)
0%
Admin Control information could not be found

21. Are the protocol's smart contract change capabilities described? (%)

Answer: 100%

GMX identifies all parameters that they can change/upgrade, and to what extent:    - Setting of swap and margin trading fees up to a maximum of 5%  - Setting of token weights for the GLP pool, token weights affect the dynamic fees of swaps, these fees are such that a swap which increases the balance towards the specified token weight will be lower, while a swap that moves the token weight away from the desired amounts will have higher fees, the details of the calculation can be found from Vault.vaultUtils.getSwapFeeBasisPoints &nbsp;- Pausing of swaps or leverage trading for emergency use &nbsp;- Setting of the maximum allowed leverage &nbsp;- Setting of maximum total capacity for long and short positions &nbsp; &nbsp;Additional timelock parameters include: &nbsp; &nbsp;- Listing of new tokens &nbsp;- UpdatingVault.priceFeed &nbsp;- UpdatingVault.vaultUtils, the VaultUtils contract validates the opening and closing of positions and also specifies how fees are calculated &nbsp;- Updating of gov` values

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
The documentation covers the capabilities for change for all smart contracts
50%
The documentation covers the capabilities for change in some, but not all contracts
0%
The documentation does not cover the capabilities for change in any contract

22. Is the protocol's admin control information easy to understand? (%)

Answer: 90%

Along with a clear explanation about the contracts' core logic being immutable, GMX details that any malicious transaction is sent, it is theoretically possible for a draining of all user funds to occur. However, any transaction that can enable this must pass through a rigorous process of internal verification, which leaves a lot of room for finding and mitigating such an event. GMX details this in clear, user friendly language:    - "In the event of a malicious transaction being sent, it is possible for all funds in the pool to be compromised. To mitigate this, all actions which can impact user funds must pass through the signal, time gap, execute process mentioned above. If a malicious transactions is detected through the monitoring process or Bug Bounty, a multi-sig consisting of advisors and community members can be used to override the Timelock.admin value, this would prevent the action from being executed. This also applies for actions such as pausing trading when there was no need to, in this case, the admin can be replaced by the multi-sig and trading can be re-activated".

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
All the contracts are immutable
90%
Description relates to investments safety in clear non-software language
30%
Description all in software-specific language
0%
No admin control information could be found

23. Is there sufficient Pause Control documentation? (%)

Answer: 80%

GMX clearly explains that their pause function can be used to halt swapping or leverage trading.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
If immutable and no changes possible
100%
If admin control is fully via governance
80%
Robust transaction signing process (7 or more elements)
70%
Adequate transaction signing process (5 or more elements)
60%
Weak transaction signing process (3 or more elements)
0%
No transaction signing process evident
Evidence of audits of signers following the process add 20%

24. Is there sufficient Timelock documentation? (%)

Answer: 100%

GMX identifies the use and the lock period of a Timelock for its GMX contract here. Additional Timelock documentation relating to the team's admin powers can be found in their Notion docs.

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
Documentation identifies and explains why the protocol does not need a Timelock OR Timelock documentation identifies its duration, which contracts it applies to and justifies this time period.
60%
A Timelock is identified and its duration is specified
30%
A Timelock is identified
0%
No Timelock information was documented

25. Is the Timelock of an adequate length? (Y/N)

Answer: 100%

GMX's timelock has a duration of 28 days for token supply upgrades. GMX's additional timelock docs identify a 24 hour timelock for anything upgrade-related. GMX mentions that 24h was selected for this subsequent timelock as it allows them to "respond quickly to any issues that may occur".

Percentage Score Guidance:
100%
Timelock is between 48 hours to 1 week OR justification as to why no Timelock is needed / is outside this length.
50%
Timelock is less than 48 hours or greater than 1 week.
0%
No Timelock information was documented OR no timelock length was identified.

Oracles

100%

This section goes over the documentation that a protocol may or may not supply about their Oracle usage. Oracles are a fundamental part of DeFi as they are responsible for relaying tons of price data information to thousands of protocols using blockchain technology. Not only are they important for price feeds, but they are also an essential component of transaction verification and security. These questions are explained in this document.

26. Is the protocol's Oracle sufficiently documented? (%)

Answer: 100

GMX briefly mentions the use of Chainlink and TWAP oracles here. In addition, GMX fully breaks down their price feed architecture in their notion docs.

Score Guidance:
100%
If it uses one, the Oracle is specified. The contracts dependent on the oracle are identified. Basic software functions are identified (if the protocol provides its own price feed data). Timeframe of price feeds are identified. OR The reason as to why the protocol does not use an Oracle is identified and explained.
75%
The Oracle documentation identifies both source and timeframe, but does not provide additional context regarding smart contracts.
50%
Only the Oracle source is identified.
0%
No oracle is named / no oracle information is documented.

27. Is front running mitigated by this protocol? (Y/N)

Answer: Yes

GMX mitigates front running attacks "through the two step transaction process, swap fees and KeeperDAO integration covered in the "Router" section". This information is documented in the GMX Notion docs.

Score Guidance:
Yes
The protocol cannot be front run and there is an explanation as to why OR documented front running countermeasures are implemented.
No
The Oracle documentation identifies both source and timeframe, but does not provide additional context regarding smart contracts.

28. Can flashloan attacks be applied to the protocol, and if so, are those flashloan attack risks mitigated? (Y/N)

Answer: Yes

GMX outlines their flash loan exploit mitigation/prevention strategy in their Notion docs.    - "Opening and closing of positions as well as swaps, minting and redeeming of GLP are settled at the oracle price covered in the Price Feeds section since these prices are not dependent on pool composition or parameters like long / short ratios, so a flash loan would not have an impact on these functions. The dynamic fees for swaps are dependent on pool composition, however, this does not lead to positive slippage so the maximum benefit from a flash loan would be a zero fee swap which adjusts pool composition towards the desired token weights".

Score Guidance:
Yes
The protocol's documentation includes information on how they mitigate the possibilities and extents of flash loan attacks.
No
The protocol's documentation does not include any information regarding the mitigation of flash loan attacks.

Appendices

null
1contract Vault is ReentrancyGuard, IVault {
2    using SafeMath for uint256;
3    using SafeERC20 for IERC20;
4
5    struct Position {
6        uint256 size;
7        uint256 collateral;
8        uint256 averagePrice;
9        uint256 entryFundingRate;
10        uint256 reserveAmount;
11        int256 realisedPnl;
12        uint256 lastIncreasedTime;
13    }
14
15    uint256 public constant BASIS_POINTS_DIVISOR = 10000;
16    uint256 public constant FUNDING_RATE_PRECISION = 1000000;
17    uint256 public constant PRICE_PRECISION = 10 ** 30;
18    uint256 public constant MIN_LEVERAGE = 10000; // 1x
19    uint256 public constant USDG_DECIMALS = 18;
20    uint256 public constant MAX_FEE_BASIS_POINTS = 500; // 5%
21    uint256 public constant MAX_LIQUIDATION_FEE_USD = 100 * PRICE_PRECISION; // 100 USD
22    uint256 public constant MIN_FUNDING_RATE_INTERVAL = 1 hours;
23    uint256 public constant MAX_FUNDING_RATE_FACTOR = 10000; // 1%
24
25    bool public override isInitialized;
26    bool public override isSwapEnabled = true;
27    bool public override isLeverageEnabled = true;
28
29    IVaultUtils public vaultUtils;
30
31    address public errorController;
32
33    address public override router;
34    address public override priceFeed;
35
36    address public override usdg;
37    address public override gov;
38
39    uint256 public override whitelistedTokenCount;
40
41    uint256 public override maxLeverage = 50 * 10000; // 50x
42
43    uint256 public override liquidationFeeUsd;
44    uint256 public override taxBasisPoints = 50; // 0.5%
45    uint256 public override stableTaxBasisPoints = 20; // 0.2%
46    uint256 public override mintBurnFeeBasisPoints = 30; // 0.3%
47    uint256 public override swapFeeBasisPoints = 30; // 0.3%
48    uint256 public override stableSwapFeeBasisPoints = 4; // 0.04%
49    uint256 public override marginFeeBasisPoints = 10; // 0.1%
50
51    uint256 public override minProfitTime;
52    bool public override hasDynamicFees = false;
53
54    uint256 public override fundingInterval = 8 hours;
55    uint256 public override fundingRateFactor;
56    uint256 public override stableFundingRateFactor;
57    uint256 public override totalTokenWeights;
58
59    bool public includeAmmPrice = true;
60    bool public useSwapPricing = false;
61
62    bool public override inManagerMode = false;
63    bool public override inPrivateLiquidationMode = false;
64
65    uint256 public override maxGasPrice;
66
67    mapping (address => mapping (address => bool)) public override approvedRouters;
68    mapping (address => bool) public override isLiquidator;
69    mapping (address => bool) public override isManager;
70
71    address[] public override allWhitelistedTokens;
72
73    mapping (address => bool) public override whitelistedTokens;
74    mapping (address => uint256) public override tokenDecimals;
75    mapping (address => uint256) public override minProfitBasisPoints;
76    mapping (address => bool) public override stableTokens;
77    mapping (address => bool) public override shortableTokens;
78
79    // tokenBalances is used only to determine _transferIn values
80    mapping (address => uint256) public override tokenBalances;
81
82    // tokenWeights allows customisation of index composition
83    mapping (address => uint256) public override tokenWeights;
84
85    // usdgAmounts tracks the amount of USDG debt for each whitelisted token
86    mapping (address => uint256) public override usdgAmounts;
87
88    // maxUsdgAmounts allows setting a max amount of USDG debt for a token
89    mapping (address => uint256) public override maxUsdgAmounts;
90
91    // poolAmounts tracks the number of received tokens that can be used for leverage
92    // this is tracked separately from tokenBalances to exclude funds that are deposited as margin collateral
93    mapping (address => uint256) public override poolAmounts;
94
95    // reservedAmounts tracks the number of tokens reserved for open leverage positions
96    mapping (address => uint256) public override reservedAmounts;
97
98    // bufferAmounts allows specification of an amount to exclude from swaps
99    // this can be used to ensure a certain amount of liquidity is available for leverage positions
100    mapping (address => uint256) public override bufferAmounts;
101
102    // guaranteedUsd tracks the amount of USD that is "guaranteed" by opened leverage positions
103    // this value is used to calculate the redemption values for selling of USDG
104    // this is an estimated amount, it is possible for the actual guaranteed value to be lower
105    // in the case of sudden price decreases, the guaranteed value should be corrected
106    // after liquidations are carried out
107    mapping (address => uint256) public override guaranteedUsd;
108
109    // cumulativeFundingRates tracks the funding rates based on utilization
110    mapping (address => uint256) public override cumulativeFundingRates;
111    // lastFundingTimes tracks the last time funding was updated for a token
112    mapping (address => uint256) public override lastFundingTimes;
113
114    // positions tracks all open positions
115    mapping (bytes32 => Position) public positions;
116
117    // feeReserves tracks the amount of fees per token
118    mapping (address => uint256) public override feeReserves;
119
120    mapping (address => uint256) public override globalShortSizes;
121    mapping (address => uint256) public override globalShortAveragePrices;
122    mapping (address => uint256) public override maxGlobalShortSizes;
123
124    mapping (uint256 => string) public errors;
125
126    event BuyUSDG(address account, address token, uint256 tokenAmount, uint256 usdgAmount, uint256 feeBasisPoints);
127    event SellUSDG(address account, address token, uint256 usdgAmount, uint256 tokenAmount, uint256 feeBasisPoints);
128    event Swap(address account, address tokenIn, address tokenOut, uint256 amountIn, uint256 amountOut, uint256 amountOutAfterFees, uint256 feeBasisPoints);
129

JavaScript Tests

Language
Files
Lines
Blanks
Comments
Testing Code
Deployed Code
Complexity
JavaScript
54
18545
3987
203
14335
8239
26

Tests to Code: 14335 / 8239 = 174 %